bjorn

Thanks @PaulStoffregen and @defragster. So perhaps I should just remove the courtyard boundaries or ignore this error? Clearly they both fit with even a slight margin between by the looks of it. Perhaps the footprints in KiCad are just overly wide?

Actually I was intending on putting the socket on the PCB, and the pins on the Teensy, just to keep it consistent. I'll try the other way around though, tbh I had thought the footprints would be about the same size but I'll try swapping the 2mm...

To add - I'm confident that the pads are aligned correctly. I used a Teensy footprint behind to be certain of this

Building a PCB in KiCad for the first time. I built the circuit around the Teensy 4.1 symbol and footprint, and then realised I need to specify headers for the board as I'm having it fully manufactured. So I need the two rows of 24 pins for GPIO...

Just trying to replace the Teensy footprint on my PCB with female socket headers. I changed the pad diameters to match those on the Teensy footprint and brought the courtyards in as close as I could but the courtyards still collide :/ I guess I...

Thank you, very useful information and great to have this confirmed. My carrier PCB is nearly ready, just have to replace the teensy footprint with headers, final checks against references then get a test print done :D

Perfect, exactly what I need thank you. I already found that the KiCad Teensy 4.1 footprint has the ethernet header in alignment so this should be straightforward :)

Designing a custom carrier PCB for a Teensy 4.1 + Ethernet project and want to sanity check a mechanical/electrical detail before I commit the layout. My plan is: Teensy 4.1 mounted to the carrier PCB using female socket headers Ethernet...