Yes, defragster - it makes sense. Noone disputes that, I guess. Specifically, version numbers make sense. I was wrong telling, that the versions are badly named. It is more that the versions are ok, but Teensies are in a sense not named at all, except for Teensy LC.
So now, would you go to all Teensy vendors and explain them, that Teensy 3.2 obsoleted Teensy 3.1 but Teensy 3.6 did not obsolete Teensy 3.2 etc., etc.? Then would you go and explain it to all their clients, me included, because I can not still say for sure that it is true, even after reading your car analogy? Which seems wrong to me in a number of places. For example, I have never heard of two different car series produced in parallel, without any specific name at all but instead with an unclear difference between minor version numbers.
Well it is your buisiness, I did not mean to argue with you, it was only a suggestion. But nevertheless, I now have a problem, should I make a new design based on 3.2, if there is 3.6 already, so perhaps they are going to make 3.2 obsolete? Or would not it just be better to switch to boards with readable, consistent names, which tell the client what the designer means?