Forum Rule: Always post complete source code & details to reproduce any issue!
-
Hi thanks. So I take it this thing can't be made to work by itself?
I suppose it's an option to use the normal magjack and then run a short internal cable to the back of the neutrik? But that seems a bit messy - what to do with the magjack - glue it to something?
It would be nice for the magjack to have a wider pcb with a couple of mounting holes - I am considering making one myself in fact.. 
Adding internal cables and connectors seems a bit messy - I am not fond of having more connections than I really need. The keystone jacks look like they would be doing the same thing as my Neutrik - but they look a bit cheap, and I don't see how they would attach to a sheet metal panel? It is intended to be a rugged piece of professional equipment, hence the metal surround is preferred. (Even though it will probably be used with a normal cat5 cable on the outside...)
My only other option is making a custom machined support for the magjack and cutting an exact rectangular hole in the panel - but that will take some time.
If there was an off the shelf magjack that has a proper panel mount, that would be ideal. Or a decent mounting system for one?
-

Originally Posted by
defragster
As noted in p#23 - if I'm reading the 'picture' right and the notes about no active components: I don't see that as an option - to use the ribbon without a magjack - or cabling punchdown wires direct to Teensy?
I agree that using the MagJack on the Teensy is the only safe way of doing it. The MagJack decouples the Rx and Tx lines from the µController. If not used and the peripheral devices create a shortcut the Teensy is most likely fryed. In my experiments I needed UDP Protocoll and a certain speed to communicate between two controlled devices. Under these conditions direct connections worked. However I changed over to MagJacks as soon as they were available. The ethernet wires are not intended for soldering, and break easily when bent a few times. As usual, it always depends on the individual situation.
-
Fact is I already started by using the magjacks - but hit a problem when trying to work out how to mount them on a panel... Did anyone think about that when designing the pcb? Sparkfun have a similar magjack which does have mounts on it, but it's not so easily used with the the miniature 6p IDC ribbon connector on the Teensy... 
-
Senior Member+

Originally Posted by
geraldt
Fact is I already started by using the magjacks - but hit a problem when trying to work out how to mount them on a panel... Did anyone think about that when designing the pcb? Sparkfun have a similar magjack which does have mounts on it, but it's not so easily used with the the miniature 6p IDC ribbon connector on the Teensy...
...
Pretty sure Panel mount for the ethernet was not considered. It was just a desktop test proof of concept/function that works in that situation.
No those boards don't offer any good mounting options - just a minimal PCB. It is on OSHPark and making an alternate version would be a good thing.
The panel mount shown looks to be usable - it just needs 'an adapter cable' to go from the punchdown connections back to an ethernet cable to feed into the required Magjack.
There may be alternate versions. I recently saw 'wall receptacle box mount faceplates' that had RJ45 ethernet plugs on both sides instead of a punchdown block. If there was a panel mount version like that it would simplify everything.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules