maturrutia
New member
Hi everyone, I'm a power electronics engineer and I'm looking for information about the Teensy. I'm starting to learn about MCU and embedded system.
I really like the Teensy capability but I would like to know if it's possible to develop a high speed communication with a FPGA. The FPGA will be used for periphericals, like several ADCs and pulses from PWM schemes (designed in the FPGA). The teensy unit will be used just for signal processing.
Previously, I've worked with the TMDSDSK6713 with a FPGA connected in the EMIF BUS. It works well but now I'm having issues with the computational burden in the DSP. For your information, that is all my experience regarding DPS or MCU units.
Regarding my requirements, is it feasible to use most of the GPIO of the teensy 4.0 (or 4.1) to communicate with the FPGA ?. How fast can be this type of implementation?. Is it a real improvement in terms of the speed computation over the previous control platform (TMDSDSK6713 +FPGA)?.
I will really appreciate any observation of this query.
Thank you !
Matias
I really like the Teensy capability but I would like to know if it's possible to develop a high speed communication with a FPGA. The FPGA will be used for periphericals, like several ADCs and pulses from PWM schemes (designed in the FPGA). The teensy unit will be used just for signal processing.
Previously, I've worked with the TMDSDSK6713 with a FPGA connected in the EMIF BUS. It works well but now I'm having issues with the computational burden in the DSP. For your information, that is all my experience regarding DPS or MCU units.
Regarding my requirements, is it feasible to use most of the GPIO of the teensy 4.0 (or 4.1) to communicate with the FPGA ?. How fast can be this type of implementation?. Is it a real improvement in terms of the speed computation over the previous control platform (TMDSDSK6713 +FPGA)?.
I will really appreciate any observation of this query.
Thank you !
Matias