defragster
Senior Member+
Looks right for FAT32. Fat16 was big enough for MS-DOS as HDD's grew - much more so accounting for var sized clusters with compression factor of 16:1. Even Win95 with FAT32 couldn't fit FAT in single alloc limit of 1MB.
512B/sec and 4B/fat entry is 128 fat entries per sector
4,092,416 B in the 7993 sectors of the FAT!
So read was 0.694 MB/sec ? ... with parsing? { 4MB in 5.9 seconds } - should read faster than that.
PRIOR NOTE p#613: Yes having just a VolumeName.ino would be nice - like i2c scanner just to show finding the attached devices.
Then perhaps read/write testing - the @mjs513 speedBench() for ref?
512B/sec and 4B/fat entry is 128 fat entries per sector
4,092,416 B in the 7993 sectors of the FAT!
So read was 0.694 MB/sec ? ... with parsing? { 4MB in 5.9 seconds } - should read faster than that.
PRIOR NOTE p#613: Yes having just a VolumeName.ino would be nice - like i2c scanner just to show finding the attached devices.
Then perhaps read/write testing - the @mjs513 speedBench() for ref?